30 Companies That Still Use Animal Testing In 2023

1. Aveeno

Under the expansive umbrella of Johnson & Johnson, Aveeno has long been associated with animal testing, a practice that has garnered considerable attention in recent times. However, amidst the winds of change blowing across industries, there has been a concerted push towards adopting alternative testing methods...

imagesource: reddit 

Under the Johnson & Johnson umbrella, Aveeno is known to test of animals. In recent years, there has been a push toward alternative testing methods that do not involve animals, & the Johnson & Johnson owned company has made a commitment to end all animal testing on its products globally, except in rare circumstances when required by regulatory authorities.Original content sourced from Femanin.com

2. Armani beauty

Ah, the allure of that flawless finish, the silky touch of Armani's Luminous Silk—a makeup aficionado's dream. Yet, nestled within the glamor of this iconic brand lies a sobering reality for animal lovers. Despite the allure of its products, Armani finds itself at odds with the ethical standards.

imagesource: reddit

If you love your Armani Luminous Silk but also care about animals, then you might want to rethink buying it next time. The brand is not certified as cruelty-free by any of the leading animal rights organizations, like PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) or Leaping Bunny.

3. Bobbi Brown

In the landscape of ethical beauty, Bobbi Brown stands as a beacon of progress, with a stance that echoes the shifting tides of conscientious consumerism. As of 2021, the brand proudly declares its products to be free from animal testing—a stride that resonates deeply with advocates of cruelty-free practices.

imagesource: reddit

As of 2021, Bobbi Brown's products are not tested on animals, with the exception of certain products that are required by law to undergo animal testing in certain regions. However, the brand has made a commitment to finding alternative testing methods and is working to phase out animal testing altogether - so hopefully within the next few years, this cult favorite will be fully cruelty free.

4. Bioderma

Bioderma, much like a kindred spirit to Bobbi Brown in the realm of ethical beauty, has charted its course toward a cruelty-free future. In a landscape where the ethical treatment of animals intertwines with scientific innovation, this brand stands as a testament to progress and conscientious choices.

imagesource: reddit

Similar to Bobbi Brown, Bioderma has been working to develop and implement alternative testing methods, such as in vitro testing and computer modelling, in order to minimize the use of animal testing. As of 2021, Bioderma claims that they do not conduct animal testing on their finished products or ingredients.

5.  ByTerry

By Terry, a brand that echoes the sentiment of ethical beauty, treads a precarious path—one that embodies the complexities inherent in the global beauty market. Their proclamation in 2021 about abstaining from animal testing for finished products reverberates with the aspirations of a conscientious consumer base.

imagesource: influenster

Another brand to have claimed to have stopped animal testing is By Terry, who claimed that they do not test their finished products on animals as of 2021. However, they do sell their products in China, where animal testing is required by law for imported cosmetics....Hmm.

6. Chapstick

Chapstick, an iconic staple in the realm of lip care, has taken a notable step forward in its quest towards ethical testing practices. Within the borders of the United States, the brand proudly boasts an abandonment of animal testing, pivoting instead towards a more humane approach—relying on willing human volunteers to assess the safety and efficacy of their new products.

imagesource: vox

In the United States, Chapstick is no longer tested on animals, it's tested on human volunteers who test out all of their new products. However, outside of the USA, in countries where it is mandatory to test on animals, this product is still sold. So it isn't a completely cruelty-free brand unfortunately.

7. Clinique

Clinique, nestled under the expansive umbrella of Estee Lauder, presents a curious dichotomy in the world of beauty and ethics. While the brand may project an image that hints at cruelty-free practices, the reality paints a more intricate picture—one shadowed by the complexities of ingredient sourcing and regulatory nuances.

imagesource: reddit

Clinque, the parent company of Estee Lauder, is a passive participant in animal testing with the majority of it's products containing animal-based ingredients such as squalene and beeswax. And just a little fact for you about this brand, they ''appear' to be cruelty free, but are not!

8. Chanel

Chanel, the epitome of sophistication in the realms of fashion, fragrance, and makeup, stands as a testament to luxury and style. Yet, behind the glamour of this iconic brand lies a complex tapestry of ethical considerations—where the pursuit of beauty intersects with the challenges of sourcing and testing ingredients.

imagesource: reddit

This French brand is well known for it's high-end makeup and scents as well as it's fashion. Not only does the makeup don online and high-street stores but so does it's perfume. Chanel is not vegan and many of it's ingredients go through the animal testing phases by supplying companies.

9. Dior

Dior, a name synonymous with elegance and luxury, occupies a prominent position within the realm of high-end fashion and beauty. However, within the ethereal world of Dior's glamour, a complex narrative unfolds—one that intertwines the pursuit of beauty with ethical considerations that traverse borders.

imagesource: reddit

Another prestigious French brand that tests on animals is Dior which operates until the Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessy (LVMH) brand. Dior makes it's products in France and is sold in China as 'imported goods', funding necessary testing - its products are gluten-free but not vegan or paraben free and if you're looking for noncomedogenic...stay well away!

10. Dr Jart+

The tale of Dr. Jart+ unveils a curious paradox—a brand that professes cruelty-free values while navigating the intricate pathways of global commerce and regulatory mandates. Nestled within the labyrinth of the beauty industry, this brand’s claims to cruelty-free status collide with the realities of its market presence and parentage.

imagesource: reddit

Like many beauty brands on the market, Dr Jart+ claims to be completely cruelty free. However, it's products are sold in mainland China and it's ingredients or suppliers test on animals. Considering it's parent company is Estee Lauder, how did anyone think this brand could be cruelty free?!

11. Ellie Saab

The world of fragrance is a symphony of scents and sensations, each note woven into an olfactory masterpiece. Yet, within this enchanting realm, the realities of ethical practices often diverge from the allure of elegance and luxury. Elie Saab, a brand renowned for its exquisite fragrances, unveils a dissonance between its alluring scents and ethical values.

imagesource: reddit

The brand that time and time again delivers those gorgeous scents, unfortunately isn't cruelty free. So if you were looking to invest in some nice perfume from a cruelty free brand, this is not the one. Ellie Saaab tests on animals and it's not vegan either, in case you're wondering!

12. Elizabeth Arden

Elizabeth Arden, a beacon of beauty and elegance, traverses a delicate tightrope in the realm of ethics and global market access. The brand's assertion of cruelty-free practices and abstention from animal testing within its own operations stands juxtaposed against a pivotal decision—the choice to sell in countries like China, where animal testing remains mandatory for imported cosmetics.

imagesource: lipglossismylife

Another brand that sells its products in countries where animal testing is mandatory. Elizabeth Arden may claim to be cruelty free and not rely on animal testing methods - yet continue to sell in countries like China. It's down to the consumer now to decide whether they want to stick with this brand or not.

13. Gillette

The saga of Gillette, under the aegis of Procter & Gamble (P&G), paints a nuanced picture within the realm of ethical beauty. P&G's historical standing as a non-cruelty-free entity casts a shadow over Gillette's association with the conglomerate.

imagesource: reddit

Gillette is owned by Procter & Gamble (P&G), which is not considered to be a cruelty-free company. However, in recent months, P&G has been working to develop and implement alternative testing methods, in order to minimise the use of animal testing moving forward.

14. Got2be

The brand’s shift away from being considered cruelty-free has caused a seismic ripple among its dedicated consumer base. Owned by Henkel and once a beacon of ethical beauty, its decision to enter the Chinese market—a region with mandatory animal testing requirements—served as a catalyst for consumer disappointment and fervent discussions about ethical choices.

imagesource: schwarzkopf

No longer considered cruelty free, this brand which is owned by Henkel sells in China. This fan favorite brand has received some heat from consumers and even though it does offer some vegan products, it doesn't seem enough for a lot of people who have since decided to stop using this brand.

15. Head & Shoulders

The landscape of cruelty-free beauty is a labyrinth of claims and contradictions, where the pursuit of ethical practices often intersects with the complexities of global markets. Head & Shoulders, a household name in hair care, finds itself entangled in the intricate web of assertions and discrepancies surrounding cruelty-free status.

imagesource: reddit

PETA lists Head & Shoulders as an animal testing brand so is not a cruelty-free brand even though it claims to be. When it comes to buying from brands that are cruelty free, you really need to do your research, because when it comes to these big brands...they LIE.

16. Kenzo

The intricate world of fashion and beauty often intersects with ethical dilemmas, and Kenzo's practices showcase a tapestry woven with ethical complexities. Beyond the allure of its clothing, the brand's beauty line treads a path that raises concerns among conscientious consumers.

imagesource: pinkwallblog

Not only does Kenzo use leather, wool, down and exotic animal hair in their clothing products, but when it comes to their beauty line they also show no slowing down when it comes to the use of animal testing. In fact, Kenzo is rated 'not good enough' overall.

17. La Mer

The beauty and skincare landscape, adorned with luxury and prestige, often conceals a labyrinth of ethical choices and industry practices. Owned by Estee Lauder, this particular luxury brand's affiliation with animal testing in regions where regulations mandate it emerges as a poignant contradiction against its aura of elegance.

imagesource: reddit

Owned by Estee Lauder, this luxury makeup and skincare brand conducts animal testing where the law demands it. They do offer some vegan products but are not-cruelty free certified and a lot of their top quality ingredients can be found in cheaper high street brands - that are cruelty free!

18. Kerastase

The interplay between a brand's claim of not testing on animals and the underlying nuances of ingredient sourcing and market access reveals the intricate dance between ethics and global regulations within the beauty industry.

imagesource: reddit

Owned by L'oreal, this brand claims to have no tested on animals, however, research shows that some of the ingredients they use in their products are still tested on animals and still sell in countries where animal testing is required by law.

19. Lancome

The juxtaposition of luxury and ethical quandaries within the beauty industry is exemplified by the complexities surrounding a renowned brand like Lancôme. Revered for its opulent makeup and intoxicating fragrances, Lancôme's veil of glamour is marred by its persistence in animal testing—a practice incongruent with evolving ethical standards.

imagesource: reddit

This well-known luxury brand is popular for both it's makeup and fragrances, yet it still tests on animals. Lanome's official testing policy is full of very ambiguous information pointing straight to the fact that it has no interest in moving away from animal testing.

20. L'Oreal

The vast expanse of the beauty industry is marked by a complex interplay between market dynamics, regulatory landscapes, and ethical imperatives. The conglomerate's allegiance to supporting animal testing, coupled with its presence in markets like China that mandate such practices, casts a shadow over the ethical landscape of beauty.

imagesource: reddit

The biggest beauty conglomerate in the world supports animal testing - it also still sells in China and supports it's mandatory testing laws. And if you're wondering about it's subsidiaries, brands like NYX, CeraVe, Redken, Garnier and Maybelline are all under that umbrella.

21. MAC Cosmetics

The evolution of MAC Cosmetics, once celebrated for its cruelty-free stance, reflects the intricate dynamics within the beauty industry. Under the ownership of Estee Lauder, MAC's trajectory towards embracing animal testing and its foray into the lucrative Chinese market illustrates a transformation fraught with ethical implications.

imagesource: nikkifromHR

MAC actually used to be cruelty free in the past but aren't anymore. Owned by animal testing-friendly giant, Estee Lauder, MAC now tests of animals and has been selling in the Chinese market since 2005. The Canada-based makeup brand has spread it's wings all around the globe.

22. Neutrogena

Neutrogena's global presence, backed by the vast umbrella of Johnson & Johnson, once stood as a beacon of accessible skincare, admired for its reach and product efficacy. However, the recent revelation of its departure from cruelty-free practices echoes a disheartening reality within the beauty industry.

imagesource: 

Owned by Johnson & Johnson, Neutrogena is available all over the globe, including China where they make 'no exceptions' to it's testing policies. Neutrogena has not been cruelty-free since this year, so when you think the world is progressing, think about some of the biggest brands in the whole world who are chosing to do the wrong thing.

23. Nars

The allure of Nars' Soft Matte Concealer as a makeup must-have often eclipses the ethical intricacies within the beauty industry. Owned by Shiseido, Nars' transition away from its previous cruelty-free status signifies a larger shift within the brand's ethos and reflects the evolving landscape of global market strategies.

imagesource: reddit

You may think Nars' soft matte concealer is the holy grail, but Nars parent brand, Shiseido has not been cruelty free since 2017 and his since been selling in the Chinese market since 2022. Both MAC and Nars have one thing in common - they used to be cruelty free brands who did a complete U-Turn.

24. Pat McGrath Labs

The ascent of Pat McGrath's makeup empire represents a pinnacle in the world of beauty, captivating enthusiasts with its mesmerizing "Golden Revolution." Yet, within the glitz and glamour lies a juxtaposition of ethical complexities within the brand's practices.

imagesource: reddit

The award winning British brand has become one of the most popular makeup brands of all time, with the world becoming obsessed with her 'Golden Revolution'. However, MUA Pat McGrath's brand is not a vegan brand and it also tests it's products on animals. Sadly, the brand denied in-house animal testing in 2017 yet couldn't provide a clear answer on ingredient-levels.

25. Sephora collection

Sephora, a retail haven for beauty enthusiasts, stands as a cornerstone of the industry, offering an expansive array of products under its in-house brand, Sephora Collection. However, the brand's ethical trajectory, particularly concerning cruelty-free practices, reveals a complex and evolving landscape within the beauty world.

imagesource: reddit

Sephora's in house brand, Sephora collection is definitely not cruelty-free and has been involved in testing by suppliers or third-parties. Its not 100% vegan and Sephora sells where testing is mandatory by law. After announcing that they would no longer be selling mink eyelashes as of 2020, Sephora took a u-turn when announcing they would be sell products in mainland China.

26. Shiseido

The enigmatic world of high-end makeup and fashion often conceals a tapestry of ethical complexities and contrasting narratives. Dolce & Gabbana, nestled within the Shiseido umbrella, exists amidst a landscape where the pursuit of luxury collides with ethical imperatives.

imagesource: reddit

Brand like Dolce & Gabbana fall under the 'Shiseido' umbrella - another brand that isn't cruelty free in the high-end makeup world. A French animal rights group revealed that Shiseido's labs mistreat genetically mutated rabbits. However, in 2022, Dolce & Gabbana stopped using real animal furs which is a small win!

27. Tom Ford

The allure of Tom Ford Beauty's luxurious aesthetics often overshadows the opacity surrounding its ethical practices. The brand's reluctance to disclose details about its testing policies poses a challenge for conscientious consumers seeking transparency in beauty choices.

imagesource: reddit

Sadly, this designer brand does not disclose anything about it's testing online, you have to literally pester them to get any answers. When asked, Tom Ford Beauty says that they repeat the standard testing policy of Estee Lauder - a non cruelty-free brand which also isn't vegan.

28. Vaseline

The ubiquity of Vaseline in the world of skincare often conceals a narrative riddled with ethical complexities. As a household name, Vaseline's association with non-cruelty-free practices underscores a larger conversation within the beauty industry about transparency and ethical accountability.

imagesource: reddit

Vaseline is currently not cruelty free and it's also not vegan either. It's parent company Unilever is also not cruelty free and is involved in animal testing for its petroleum jelly. Vaseline doesn't hold a clear stance against animal testing on it's website either so their branding does not feature of leaping bunny logo.

29. Victoria Secrets

Victoria's Secret, renowned for its fragrances and body sprays, exists within a narrative marked by ethical considerations within the beauty industry. Despite its popularity, the brand's lack of certification by organizations like PETA or Leaping Bunny sheds light on its stance regarding cruelty-free practices.

imagesource: reddit

Not certified by PETA or Leaping Bunny, VS's sprays and scents are testing on animals, and contain ingredients from animals, including beeswax and honey - big NO NO. Victoria Secrets do not meet any of the criteria, in fact, they're still very far off even though they say they're trying.

30. Yves Rocher

The intriguing world of French pharmacy brands encompasses a legacy of trust and efficacy, yet within this domain lies a brand entangled in ethical complexities. This pharmaceutical brand, founded in 1965, holds a significant place in the beauty realm, but its claims of being cruelty-free and vegan mask a more nuanced reality.

imagesource: reddit

The French pharmaceutical brand has not only stated that they're cruelty free when they're not, but they also claim to be vegan. Although some of their products are actually vegan, they often miss sell products. Founded in 1965, this brand is still one of the most popular French pharmacy brands around.

31. Arm & Hammer

Arm & Hammer, widely recognized for its baking soda-based products, unveils a lesser-known facet within its offerings—deodorants featuring the distinctive baking soda base. However, despite its association with household staples, the brand's ethical stance presents a contrasting narrative.

image source: reddit.com

You might have only know that Arm & Hammer do baking soda, but did you know that they also do deodorants with a baking soda base? Either way, Arm & Hammer isn't a cruelty-free company, and that's because its parent company tests on animals, as do its suppliers.

32. Aussie

Aussie, renowned for its vivid purple packaging and hair care prowess, finds itself navigating the ethical terrain of cruelty-free practices within the beauty industry. Amid its distinct visual presence, the brand's recent strides toward cruelty-free commitments herald a transition that isn't yet fully realized.

image source: melyssawilliams.com

The brand Aussie is most notable for that bright purple packaging. They've also made recent attempts to go cruelty-free, but it doesn't look like they're fully there yet. They made a statement that their adult products would no longer use animal testing, but the kids or infant products will still be tested on animals.

33. Avon

Avon, an iconic name often associated with the cherished memory of the "Avon lady," holds a unique place in the realm of household beauty brands. Yet, within its legacy lies a nuanced ethical narrative concerning its stance on animal testing.

image source: ebay.com

Avon is one of those brands everyone knows - sort of a household name, growing up knowing the 'Avon lady' was at the door. Sadly, they're not completely cruelty-free - although they have made attempts to lessen their impact on animals, they still deal with third-party vendors who test on animals.

34. Benefit

Benefit Cosmetics, a celebrated brand in the makeup industry, stands amidst the complex ethical landscape that encompasses cruelty-free practices. While the brand itself proclaims a commitment to not testing on animals, the nuances within its operations paint a more intricate picture.

image source: reddit.com

Benefit is a brand that does claim to be cruelty-free, and that their products are not tested on animals. The thing with this is, although the Benefit employees themselves may not test on animals, the company pays third-party vendors to test their products and sell in China, which means they can't be 100% animal testing-free.

35. Blistex

Blistex, a household name when it comes to lip care, plays a role in the ethical discourse surrounding cruelty-free beauty. Despite being a trusted go-to for many dealing with chapped lips, the brand's presence in China brings forth a notable ethical dilemma.

image source: reddit.com

Blistex is a lip balm we all know about - most of us have probably used it at some point in our lives. It's the go-to for a lot of people with chapped lips, but it's also not cruelty-free. Blistex sells its products in China, which means it's knowingly having third-parties test its products on animals.

36. Calvin Klein

Calvin Klein, a renowned name in designer clothing and fragrance, unveils a lesser-known facet within its product offerings—the ethical considerations surrounding its fragrances. Despite its reputation for stylish apparel, the brand's foray into the fragrance industry and its presence in the Chinese market shed light on an ethical dilemma.

image source: reddit.com

When you think of companies that might test on animals, you probably don't think of Calvin Klein first - because of their reputation for designer clothing and underwear lines. But they also do fragrances - and these fragrances are claimed to be vegan-friendly, but their products are sold in mainland China.

37. Clairol

Clairol, renowned for its vibrant hair color and diverse beauty products, navigates an ethical conundrum within the realms of cruelty-free practices. The brand's assertion of being cruelty-free is juxtaposed against its market presence in mainland China, a region where animal testing is mandatory for imported cosmetics.

image source: reddit.com

Clairol is well known for its bold hair color, as well as other beauty products, and the company does say that it's cruelty-free. However, Clairol has its products tested on animals to sell in mainland China - and while they may not test themselves, they pay third parties to do so.

38. Clean & Clear

Clean & Clear, a go-to brand for those dealing with acne-prone skin, emerges within the realm of skincare with a noteworthy ethical consideration. The brand's widespread popularity for its effective products contrasts with its ethical stance on animal testing.

image source: reddit.com

Anyone acne prone or in their teenage years has reached for Clean & Clear at least once! Their products are well known - but they also test on animals. The company has spoken about how they're worked to have an alternative to testing on animals, but they still test when it's required by law.

39. Burberry

Burberry, celebrated for its high-end fashion and captivating fragrances, grapples with an ethical dilemma within the realm of cruelty-free beauty. While the brand's perfumes and colognes allure many with their alluring scents, their presence in the Chinese market unveils a poignant contrast in ethical standards.

image source: reddit.com

Burberry is known for its expensive designer clothes, but it also has a huge range or perfumes and colognes that a lot of people buy and love for their strong scents. Unfortunately, these fragrances are not considered cruelty-free because Burberry's products are sold in China.

40. Axe

Axe, known for its body sprays and deodorants that often evoke nostalgia, finds itself entangled in an ethical conundrum within the realm of cruelty-free practices. The brand's assertion of being cruelty-free stands in contrast to its decision to market and sell products in China.

image source: reddit.com

Axe is a staple for body spray and deodorant, especially for young men! There's a sense of nostalgia with Axe, after all. This company claims to be cruelty free, but the reality is that their products are sold in China, which means they're pushing their products in a market that requires animal testing.

41. Clearasil

Clearasil, a prominent skincare brand renowned for spot treatments and catering to acne-prone skin, grapples with ethical considerations within the realm of cruelty-free beauty. While the brand specializes in addressing skincare needs, its ownership and market presence raise ethical concerns.

image source: reddit.com

Clearasil is another well-known brand for skincare in the realm of spot treatment and acne-prone skin. But Clearasil is actually owned by a company that continues to conduct animal-testing, and Clearasil also sells its products in China, so will be tested on animals due to regulations.

42. Elixir Perfume

Elixir Perfume, nestled under the umbrella of the renowned brand Clinique, finds itself amid the ethical discourse surrounding cruelty-free practices within the fragrance industry. While Elixir Perfume might captivate with its popularity and alluring scents, its affiliation with Clinique, which indirectly conducts animal testing, presents ethical considerations.

image source: reddit.com

Elixir Perfume is a fragrance line that is parented by the well-known brand, Clinique - and Clinique is a brand that tests on animals indirectly. The Elixir perfumes may be popular and pleasant, but you can find many cruelty-free fragrances as an alternative to this brand.

43. Fendi

Fendi, an illustrious name in the fashion realm renowned for its luxury fashion and leather goods, navigates an ethical quandary within the broader discourse of cruelty-free practices. Despite its reputation for sophistication, the brand's involvement in the production of fur products and fragrances sheds light on its ethical stance.

image source: reddit.com

Fendi is very well known for its fashion products and leather goods, but it also sells fur products and fragrances which aren't cruelty-free. They test their products (and their ingredients) on animals, and they push their products to sell in the Chinese market - which means they aren't cruelty free.

44. GlamGlow

GlamGlow, a prominent beauty company celebrated for its skincare offerings, grapples with ethical considerations within the landscape of cruelty-free beauty. Despite its reputation for innovative skincare solutions, the brand's association with Estee Lauder and its presence in the Chinese market present ethical dilemmas.

image source: reddit.com

GlamGlow cosmetics is a beauty company that is owned by Estee Lauder - and GlamGlow cosmetics is unfortunately not cruelty free! They sell their products in China, and they pay for their products to be tested in a third-party Chinese lab, as per the regulations.

45. Ivory

Procter & Gamble, a significant player in the consumer goods industry, grapples with ethical considerations within the domain of cruelty-free practices. As the parent company of renowned brands like Ivory, its involvement in animal testing for product ingredients and post-market stages poses ethical dilemmas.

image source: amazon.ca

We mentioned that the company Proctor & Gamble wasn't cruelty free - and Proctor & Gamble is also the parent company of the soap brand, Ivory. Both Ivory and Proctor & Gamble test their product ingredients on animals, as well as the post-market stage to sell in China.

46. Jo Malone

The beauty industry's commitment to cruelty-free practices has become a key consideration for consumers, and Jo Malone, known for its luxurious fragrances, enters this discourse with some ambiguity surrounding its stance on animal testing.

image source: reddit.com

Jo Malone doesn't clearly state is policy on animal testing - which means it probably isn't cruelty-free. Most companies would want to state explicitly that they don't test on animals. Jo Malone's parent company is also Estee Lauder, and their products sell in China.

47. Coppertone

Coppertone, a prominent brand recognized for its sun care products, faces ethical scrutiny within the domain of cruelty-free practices. As a subsidiary of Bayer, a conglomerate involved in animal testing, Coppertone's association within this framework raises ethical considerations.

image source: reddit.com

Coppertone is not a cruelty-free company, and neither is its parent company, Bayer. Both of these companies sell their products in China, and Coppertone has made it clear that they continue to test on animals for their ingredients as well as their finished products.

48. Mary Kay

Mary Kay, a multi-level marketing company renowned for its diverse product range, grapples with the complexities of cruelty-free practices within the beauty industry. Despite its assertion of not testing on animals in other countries, the brand's presence in China unveils a crucial ethical dilemma.

image source: reddit.com

Mary Kay is a multi-level marketing company with lots of different products popular with consumers. But its consumer base also includes China - so even if Mary Kay says it does not test on animals in any other country, it still has to adhere to the animal testing regulations in China.

49. Estee Lauder

Estee Lauder, a significant player in the beauty industry, finds itself amidst the ethical discourse surrounding cruelty-free practices. Despite its strides towards embracing cruelty-free commitments, the brand's continued presence in the Chinese market unveils an ongoing ethical dilemma.

image source: reddit.com

Estee Lauder has been mentioned many times on this list of being the parent company of many different animal-testing brands - and Estee Lauder itself is not cruelty-free. They are doing some work to go cruelty-free, but at the moment, they still sell products in China.

50. Max Factor

Max Factor, a widely recognized beauty brand known for its diverse product range, grapples with multiple ethical concerns within the realm of cruelty-free practices and sustainability. The brand's dual challenges concerning animal testing in China and the use of palm oil in its products raise crucial ethical considerations.

image source: reddit.com

Max Factor is another very popular beauty brand, selling a range of products - but their actually doubly problematic, because not only are they not cruelty-free (they sell their products in China and go through the regulated animal testing) they also use palm oil in their products.